Lifestylism Politicography
Ultrawokeness
I overall agree with the jist of this Candace Owens-Tucker Carlson interview here
White Paint is great, see here for my attacks on a woke fascist Eurotrash company saying otherwise
Christopher Rufo is center right and he is not full right wing or far right, anyone who says otherwise is a fool. Because the woke radlib Democrats are more radical and extreme than Christopher Rufo could be
The ADL wrongly considers 17% of the numbers between 0-100 as hate symbols
9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18, 21, 23, 28, 33, 38, 43, 52, 83, 88, 90
Using these numbers can get you put on their 'Incidents of Hate' list which they forward to law enforcement weekly. We cannot allow the ADL to do this, the only number in that list that is a hate symbol is 88, every other number should be delisted as a hate symbol.
The ADL has gone overboard above, sorry all those numbers except for 88 are NOT hate symbols. The ADL keeps making up these numbers as hate symbols in order to have an excuse to censor speech and go after their political enemies. The ADL is a very liberal organization that is as partisan as it can get and it is anti left in particular. I will use every number above except for 88 in my future usernames, on my shirts etc just to say FUCK YOU ADL
The ADL themselves should be on the 'incidents of hate' for listing all the numbers except for 88 on their stupid fake 'hate symbol' list, some people rightfully say that the ADL is a hate group and I can see why
Etc
I am Anti censorship . Censorship is wrong 9 times out of 10 and any society that embraces or justifies censorship is a society that is heading toward totalitarianism, fascism and autocratic-tyrannical rule. Google complies with harsh censorship policies of the Chinese government and other places so it is no surprise they are pro censorship everywhere. I stand with the ACLU in our fight to end censorship. See this for more
I am absolutely against the government spying on us citizens and I am absolutely against universal government surveillance. That is literally 1984 and George Orwell would be spinning in his grave if this poll by CATO and yougov is true (here and here)
It is bad enough with police brutality being as it is , but can you imagine how much police brutality would occur with universal government surveillance? There would be George Floyd and Rodney King type incidents every day, multiple times a day.
If true, it means that young people are uber snowflakes, pansies and every negative stereotype about them is true. It means our society is doomed, since 1 in 4 of them support having our most basic freedoms stripped from us in order for them to have a false sense of security.
How can they go on and on about democracy and human rights when they are wrongly willing to live in a society with universal government surveillance (or any government surveillance for that matter) which is the polar opposite of democracy and human rights (like the right of privacy). Even Europe of all places heavily values privacy.
If 27 percent of young Americans really wants universal government surveillance, that is just as big of a threat to our country as MAGA are if not more so.
If that many young people really support universal government surveillance then they should be thrown in fema camps because they are a threat to my freedom and everyone elses freedom
Who wants literal big brother spying on them 24/7? That is degrading and horrible in every way. The government is not a God, the government has no right to spy on its citizens, especially every citizen 24/7, I shouldn't have to explain just how wrong that is (at least I hope I shouldn't have to explain)
If that poll is true I will hunt down any American who wrongly supports universal government surveillance and I will deradicalize them and literally force them to be against universal government surveillance and even against the government spying on its citizens in any form. I am serious, I will do this, I have freedom of movement and I will get to those young people somehow someway then I'll win
I don't believe that more than 10 percent of people under 30 support universal government surveillance, either because they are lying or just impulsively said they support it without thinking about it. I bet my life that if any of the so called 27 percent of kids under 30 who supposedly said they support universal government surveillance spent 1 day with the government watching their every move in their homes none of them would support government surveillance in any way shape or form ever again
I do not believe that poll is real and I think the percent of young people under 30 who support universal government survillence is more like single digit percent or 14 percent at most.
"The question wording is not neutral. The part about domestic violence, abuse, and illegal activity will change how people respond. I suspect some people supported the surveillance because they oppose those negative activities and didn't think through whether the surveillance would actually help or not."
"This.
Throw in the fact that 10% of people will say yes to anything in these kind of surveys and the results becime fairly meaningless.
Its garbage, just ignore it."
"Exactly. Lots of people already can't understand long sentences, even a former president of the US of A. So they'll latch on to the last part, "reduce domestic violence, abuse, and other illegal activity". If the last words had been "prevent pet owners from beating their dogs and eating their bunny rabbits", there'd have been support for that too"
"I am quite sure that a lot of respondents are not taking the question seriously. Some people will see it as so over the top that they'll treat it as a joke and say they're for it when they would never support it if it were a serious proposal.
Also, as others have pointed out, there's the issue of non-neutral wording; polling questions about issues that most people haven't really thought about tend to get inaccurate results, as people give a "first thought" response, which often wouldn't be their real opinion if they took the time to actually think about it. "Who do you plan to vote for in the upcoming election" and "do you approve of the president" tend to get solid responses; "do you support this hypothetical you've never heard of before" does not."
I support the great job Merrick Garland is doing in regards to the January 6 2021 incident and I think his work is wrongly being undermined by Jack Smith. In some weird way, Merrick Garland is sort of , dare I say it BASED
Jack Smith has a lot of guts to go against Donald Trump and I love how confident Jack was eating at that Subway about going up against Donald Trump. But Jack Smith himself can have this case boomerang on him ,so if I was Jack Smith I would tread very very carefully with Donald Trump. This is not for Trump's sake but for Jack's sake.
On the domestic front, excerpted: [3]
"The term ‘continuity of government‘ became much more common in the aftermath of 9-11-01 and the thunder shock of an al-Qaeda inspired terrorist attack in New York and Washington DC.
Within the very brief discussion period that led up to the 10-26-01 Patriot Act, literally a structural reform of the entire domestic terrorist apparatus that created the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Transportation Safety Administration (TSA), a bill only debated for a few weeks, the baseline was the enhanced ‘continuity of government‘ in the event of an emergency.
...the outcome of the Patriot Act was to create a system where every American was now viewed by our federal government through the prism of the citizen being a potential terrorist threat. The federal government aligned all of our institutions and systems accordingly.
DHS was created to monitor American behavior, the TSA was created to scan American travelers, and the FBI was enhanced with resources to conduct surveillance despite our Fourth Amendment protections within our constitution. Instead of the U.S. govt protecting U.S. citizens from foreign threats, the Patriot Act change the mission of government to protect itself from potential citizen threats.
In essence, We the People became the suspects, and all of the constitutional viewpoints within the FBI and Dept. of Justice were modified to create monitoring systems.
The legislative branch was considered part of a this newly protected elite class of Americans, and the judicial branch deferred all scrutiny to the executive as long as they claimed, ‘national security.’ The secret FISA court system would grant the agents surveillance power over U.S. citizens.
As the foundation of this new surveillance state was just being finalized, Barack Obama, Joe Biden and Eric Holder then entered government via the 2008 election, and weaponized this system to target their domestic political opposition....
...it was the viewpoint of a very specific type of government “continuity” that led to the opposition against Donald Trump by democrats and republicans.
Trump would be a disruptive influence if introduced into a continuation mission that did not like change. This ‘continuity’ mindset then established the justification for every institution and element of the bureaucracy, including almost all layers of the people who run them, to oppose Donald Trump.
By the time the 2016 election arrives, We the People had already been defined by the Patriot Act outcome as a threat to government. If we the people did not select the right kind of candidate who would be approved by the continuity system, then our selection would be rejected by all of the operators of that administrative system....
We need a third political party not third party candidates
RFK Jr did tweet a nazi dogwhistle with his 14/88 Tweet. He knew exactly what he was doing because the numbers we close together, he used numbers instead of saying 'two weeks and almost 3 months' or 'two weeks and 3 months (rounding to the 3 for the latter)' This comes after his 'off the record' comment to the NYpost about Jews. It's like RFK Jr purposely waited until he could use 14 days and 88 weeks to tweet his nazi dogwhistle.
Our enemy is beyond the political spectrum, and that enemy of ours is the bourgeois neoliberal-neoconservative ruling class and its MSM mouthpieces
Some good takes on social media bias that raises some fair points to chew on ,see here, here (counterpoint here). The MSM is bias against Progressives , Leftists (Progressives are not Left Wing), and rightfully against Right Wingers. The MSM only supports establishment, New Democrat-Center Lefty So the MSM is Neoliberal-Neoconservative biased
It is establishment vs leftist outsiders (right wingers can join in if they become left of the Democrats and Labour Party UK on every cultural issue and thus stopping being right wing scum)
It doesn't matter that every criticism of the left by the mainstream Democrat neoliberals come from the right, it is still coming from normies against radicals so they might as well be criticizing us leftists from the right
Only rarely does the mainstream Democrat liberal neocon establishment criticize the left from both the right and from a contrarian, outsiderish position (James Clyburn's criticism of free college is such a rare example) But that is woke economics and I am against woke economics
I cannot stand the constant moral piousness virtue signaling and whining for 'muh liberty', 'muh freedoms' by Populist Libertarian, 'Classical Liberals'/Heterdox 'Liberals' such as Glenn Greenwald, Sameera Khan, RFK Jr, Matt Taibbi, Haz, Jimmy Dore (for the most part), Tim Pool etc. Even on the off chance if they are correct on most of the issues, I still want them to be oppressed by Social Liberal 2.0ers/Wokie progressives/Corporate Democrats like I do now just to shut them the fuck up.
They are so annoying they make me want to support their Social Liberal 2.0ers/Wokie progressives/Corporate Democrats nemesis just to spite them
Both Cenk and Ana reflect my views on our political landscape here
In particular this : "fair number two uh I understand where they're going with the double standard they say look you know you're telling me Donald Trump broke all these laws but then you've got all these other politicians who are corrupt and nobody ever says anything about them and they're not wrong about that mainstream media if you're an outsider or you don't belong in the establishment with your Trump Bernie et cetera they'll find a thousand things wrong with you and then the most corrupt people on Earth are your mainstream Republicans and Democrats and make sure media can't find anything wrong with them just can't find it right like give me Jack Smith as a prosecutor I'll get you incredible um things that Mitch McConnell's done wrong Nancy Pelosi has done wrong so"
"it's so jarring to remember the anti-Vietnam war and anti-Iraq protests in which I joined many tens of thousands. The Liberal 2.0/Lib embrace of the state apparatus and vicious war mongering (cluster bombs, yay!) has done the seemingly impossible and transmuted me into being what I am today. Truly clown world.
"Corporate media has increasingly created closed information systems around every major issue: Russiagate, Big Pharma, Ukraine, etc. Dissent from their orthodoxies is branded "disinformation," then censored.
That's why a free internet is so vital, and why it's their main target.
Around the democratic world outside Europe, there is vibrant and substantial debate over how to see the war. That dissent in key countries is just absent from US corporate outlets."
I agree with nearly all of the testimony by Jamie Raskin and Kweisi Mfume in the special hearings on July 19 2023. In particular I agree with Jamie Raskin and Kweisi Mfume in that we need to make tax evasion penalties for all Americans regardless of class or status stronger and that we need to support the IRS more
I am planning on lending personal life support to Joe Biden for his 2024 Prez bid to heal him personally to make him heal politically so that I can echo Jennifer Rubin in this article on Joe Biden and what Joe Biden needs to do in his second term to improve
I am against the debt ceiling deal for the reasons that Ana Kasparian, Cenk :
and other progressives are against it
Allyships
The liberals and progressives hatred of leftist politics comes from McCarthyism and the Red Scare. So any Anti Socialism, Pro Capitalism, negating USSR's role in defeating the naughtize scum in WWII etc comes straight from the right wing fringe of segregationist racist reactionary scumbag William SucKKKley's National Re vew, Joseph MKKKarthy, etc. Even Richard Nixon realized that there was merit with Communism and Socialism which is why he was so progressive economically compared to these losers on the right today
I absolutely agree with this Jacobin article . There is NO such thing as 'Right wing Marxism'. Any Democrat, leftist, Liberal or Progressive who takes National Review's side on 'right wing Marxism' existing over Jacobins side is a FAKE Democrat, Leftist, liberal ,progressive. National Review is a far right racist, sexist, bourgeois rag. No true Democrat, Leftist, Liberal or Progressive would ever side with National Review over Jacobin.
Any leftist, progressive or Liberal who doesn't agree with Jacobin's above article and who wrongly take National Review's side on this is a brainwashed Neoliberal, Liberal Corporate cultist and no better than the Alt Lite.
It is so sad that the 'left' was hijacked by right wingers in the 1960s that some of these retards would actually side with National Review over Jacobin on whether right wing Marxism exists. It is insanity nonsense and any leftist, progressive or liberal who takes National Review's side over Jacobin on this and falsely says that right wing Marxism exists is a right wing nutjob and should be ostracized and harassed until they admit that Jacobin was correct and National review was wrong and that right wing marxism doesn't exist.
Only mentally deranged retards would disagree with me and Jacobin on this.
If anyone is right wing it is the modern Democrat Party and Liberals. Half of them condemned Socialism, they don't give a fuck about unions, they trash progressives like AOC, Jamaal Bowman, Ihlan Omar. They abonded a true leftist Nina Turner.
They colluded against Bernie Sanders. James Clyburn doesn't want free college, they join the right wing idpolists by judging people by their skin color instead of the content of their character, they support the FBI and CIA and the government spyign programs, instead of supporting peace in Ukraine-Russia they support a forever blank check dispense from the US to Ukraine even supporting evil deadly cluster bombs which will only worsen the war, they view political views they don't agree with in the least charitable way, and see the worst in people, they cheer when anyone even close to being right wing dies, these sick monsters supported the train derailment in Ohio because it was 'trump country' etc
They criticize people for trying to get homeless people housing and jobs and money. Democrats and Liberals in the US are right wing not Marxism and I will force Gina Riccardi Mohrhauser to agree with me here even if i have to break into her home and force her to agree (she lives in Jacksonville Florida)
Their blind hatred of all things Trump has turned them into mini Trumps, especially the Twitter loser trolls who do nothing but attack the left, centrer and right because they are too braindead to show how they would make our country better.
I touch on this a bit in this section of one of my other blog spheres
Marxism is not right wing, it is left wing. If anyone is right wing it is the modern Democrat party. Marxism was deformed by Joseph Stalin and Vlad Lenin. Rosa Luxemberg was not right wing, she was peaceful. Libertarian Marxism is not right wing, Anarcho Communism is not left wing.
National Review falsely saying that the populist right are 'right wing Marxists' is as dumb and false as saying the Nazis were 'leftists' or saying that the Democratic Party are 'communists'
I am going to literally use fasting and prayers and zealous SJWism from the centre to coerce any Democrat, Liberal, leftist or Progressive who wrongly sides with National Review over Jacobin on this 'right wing Marxism' nonsense . I will do so in public outside their work. I will facebook message them 24/7/365 until they agree with Jacobin over National Review on this matter. No true Democrat, Leftist, liberal or progressive would falsely think that any right winger is 'Marxist' . Only retards would think so
If right wing Marxism exists than Cultural Marxism exists. If neoliberal liberal bourgeois aristocratic elitist plutocrat swine falsely say that right wing Marxism exists then they should be forced via terrorism, to also admit that Cultural marxism exists. So what I am saying is that if right wing marxism exists as the far right racist, transphobic, homophobic, sexist, shit rag National review claims then that means that Cultural Marxism exists also.
This post and thread here on AskaLiberal perfectly backs my points above up
U.S. politics under the duopoly (and dualism) is not about helping the people or planet. It’s about controlling the people and planet. And they control us by dividing us. They split the people into two teams (red vs. blue) while they are on the same team and serve the same corporate interests.
Joe Biden is correct to defend his son Hunter. That is what a good father does. Joe Biden is a good father
I agree with MSNBC that Casey Desantis is either the bright side of the grinch like Ron Desantis or a Karen. That MNSBC commentator had a good take and he realizes that Ron Desantis is hard to like but Casey is either the bright spot or a Karen in regards to Ron. Bravo to MSNBC and that commentor for their good analysis of the Desantises. As a Floridan I concur and see this for myself every day
Red-brown alliances, post-Cold War
McCarthyism while wrong was NOT discrimination. It went after Communism but Communism is not a person and thus you can't discriminate against Communism since it is a political ideology not a person. Anyone who says otherwise should be
Red-brownism is messy concept, but informationally dense and useful (Emmi Bevensee). Other terms used by researchers and antifascists include: left-right convergence (USA and UK); confusionism (France); querfront (Germany); red-brown alliance (Russia and Eastern Europe or Central Europe); left accommodation (Marxist term); alt-imperialism (Joey Ayoub); unorthodox fascism; fascist creep (Alexander Reid Ross), fascist drift or fascist entryism; and tendril theory or tentacle theory.
There are actually very few instances of full crossing-over or convergences between movements, and even then usually only on limited number of issues which tend to be unstable and short-lived. It’s more intense in places like Eastern and Central Europe with nominal Communists stemming from resurgence of nationalistic tendencies during 1960s onwards. But in most countries the left and the right stay apart even if they occasionally run parallel or certain groups adopt specific issues of the other side. Flirting is not unusual, but consummation is rare (Spencer Sunshine).
Consensus credibility works because different people independently came to the same conclusion
I agree with this Destiny redditor that Bronze Age Pervert is on my periphery for weird philosophy people. I second that Destiny redditor that I should be more knowledgeable about them than I am, and that I kinda ignore them unless they're actively involving themselves in some rat-adjacent discourse.
I also agree with agree with this Destiny redditor that BAP is probably an interesting guy to bounce ideas off of. But like said redditor, I don't really follow anyone who "subscribes" to him, fully, like a follower.
I agree with this article on BAP and the radical right
Liberals are correct X (twitter) is now a right wing, alt lite, radical centrist, liberal dissendent cesspool . Before Elon Muskkk twitter boosted Conservative accounts then Elon Muskkk takes over and it is flooded with right wingers who are doing their best to make me hate them as much as I hate twitter libs. Elon hides this by continuing to censor right wingers to make him look sensible but I am on to him. I live in Florida, Elon livess in Texas, Elon screws with me, i will go itchy and scratchy on his ass
Rights
I am against vulgar Humanism where people worship themselves and demand their rights
Pol
Some of my views on RFK Jr can be found here
Ok so all charges and accusations against Donald Trump are accurate but all charges and accusations against Hunter Biden and Joe Biden are fake . What are the odds?
I want to get the Republican party banned forever and to prevent right wingers from running for office. Then I want the creation of a left wing party (to the left of the Democrat party) to replace Democrats as the left party in American politics which will cause the Democrats by default to be the right wing party in the US
I endorse and support Dr Cornel West for President but I think he should run as a Democrat to challenge Joe Biden from the left (since Dr West is to the left of Joe Biden on literally nearly ever damn issue and Dr West is to the left of the Democrat party as a whole on nearly all issues). See here for more
I agree with this post on AskALiberal about Republican candidates for the 2024 'election'
I want the Republican party to stop being the party of obstruction and culture war,
I can live with Nikki Haley becoming President. She is popular even among Democrats
This article from the WaPo makes me think that Mike Pence might be a decent President if he had my combined views on abortion that is, as it is now NO
I am against the Video Game and Esports Caucus. Video games and 'esports' have no place in Congress or the Senate. I am going to DC soon and I will literally force Congress and the Senate to abolish the Video game and Esports caucus. I will get into the Capital to make this magic happen. Over 70 percent of Americans have never played a real video game (i.e a console or arcade video game) It is immature, and dumb to have a video game and esports caucus. Congress and the Senate should be focusing on solving problems not letting a niche childlish hobby like gaming to get in the way.
This is why I will never support any Congress or Senate person. Shame on those pieces of shit
Video games are not bipartisan either. Most Democrats hate video games
I am Anti Nick Fuentes but if the Crowder Club is truly a 'replatforming space' then they should allow Nick Fuentes to be on that 'replatforming space' because otherwise they are not truly a 'replatforming space'. Besides those right wingas deserve each other
I echo this quote by Cenk Uyghur in regards to this Jimmy Dore clip:
"This is exactly why I called Jimmy Dore the fake left. This is a hardcore MAGA conspiracy he's promoting on-air. Does the FBI infiltrate a lot of activist groups? Yes. Should they? Most of the time, no. Because they often target peaceful groups, historically almost always on the left. But they are now finally infiltrating some on the right to monitor them. If they had agents in the crowd during the riot, then they made the most logical choice they've ever made - it turns out those were not peaceful protestors! If they were monitoring them, they were correct! They picked the right group to be focused on when it came to potential violence (the only thing they should be concerned about). Jimmy Dore and Tucker Carlson have NO EVIDENCE that the FBI INSTIGATED the riot (let alone infiltrated it). But they tell their audience (MAGA) that the FBI monitored, instigated and caused the riot and blamed it on poor Trump and his innocent militia followers. Intensely deceptive and inarguably right-wing."
It was absolutely wrong for the Canada sub to ban the user for merely asking why the article on the Toronto principle who killed himself was taken down. That is 1984 Orwellian evil behavior to ban that user so I plan on going from Florida to the homes of every member of that Canada mod team and breaking into their homes to literally force them to unban that user and if they still won't do so I will go medival on their asses and the asses and beat my request to unban said user into their heads.
Comments
Post a Comment