ID views
A lot of 'anti woke' people use being anti woke as a cover for being racist against poc. Laura Loomer's anti woke crusade is a front for her real agenda of white nationalism. Loomer uses an anti woke narrative as a dogwhistle for her white nationalism . She even brags about living in the 'whitest town in Florida'. She is a bigot. Same thing goes for anti woke crusader Richard Hanania: https://www.thedailybeast.com/why-clown-pundits-are-defending-a-racist-to-own-the-libs. He too uses anti woke narratives as a dogwhistle for his racism
The modern Democrat liberal MSM establishment say if you aren't helping fight for margainalized groups rights you are hurting by getting in the way, no matter how left wing or progressive you may be. This is what one of them said to Zuby on Twitter and it made sense to me.
So if you only fight for class or are an armchair Left Communist for example you are given a negative score on the woke social credit system; the more marginalized groups you help, the higher score you get. Like a real life video game . This is why I can live with Democrat radlib shitlibs going hard on leftists and progressives like they do, but I still cannot accept it nor can I support their rank system above
White Supremacy and Democracy the way it has been used by ultras and woke people in the last 5 years are empty words that have no meaning. We constantly hear the libs wokescold us about 'white supremacy=bad, white supremacy=bad omg' yet they never explain what this so called 'white supremacy' is. Same thing when they go on about so called 'Democracy'. So it isn't wokeness per say that is an empty word but it is more so White Supremacy and Democracy (the way they are used recently) that are such
One example is this evil extremist woke tweet by PETA years back. For starters that tweet by PETA is a bold face lie and disinformation. Milk has NOTHING to do with so called 'white supremacy' and furthermore milk has never had anything to do with so called 'white supremacy' in any way shape or form. Peta never explains what white supremacy is because they are lying and they know it.
They are desperate to stop people from drinking milk from cows so they made up a lie about milk being tied to 'white supremacy'. As if PETA's stupid dumb evil lying tweet about 'white supremacy' being tied to milk wasn't woke enough, these freaks topped it off with fucking pride colors in their twitter photo. I mean seeing that tweet by PETA plus said pride colors makes me wish the US lose World War II
Same thing goes for the empty word 'muh democracy' that libs spout over and over again recently. Notice these foolish twats never explain what 'democracy' is. Our country is a Constitutional Republic, not a 'Democracy'. If all the things I complain about and criticize in my blog spheres that the Democrats don't like is considered 'Democracy' then maybe Democracy is a bad thing after all. F*** your Democracy you Democracy fetish nuts
To sum it up whenever libtards disagree with a view instead of explaining why, or debating or trying to see if maybe they are wrong, they instead revert back to their childish, immature, moronic self and say any view they disagree with is 'against muh democracy' or is 'white supremacy der der'. Someone needs to slap these fools upside their heads to knock a little sense into them
I touch on this evil habit of libs labeling everything they disagree with as so called 'white supremacy' here
If white supremacy is everywhere it is nowhere
I have this view on Equity here and I am also Pro Equality (I support Equality of Opportunity but I do also reject Equality of outcome).
I support Equitism but when used in conjunction with other ideologies. (i.e I align with Leftist Equitarian ideology), (i.e I align with this type of Leftist Equitarian ideology )
I am not an Anti racist (I am a non racist)
However, if someone has OCD w intrusive thoughts that tells them they are anti black when they aren't (like if their mind is so messed up they take being anti idpol/intersectionality from a left perspective as being anti black, or mix up their anti consumerism with anti blackness) then maybe unconscious bias training can be used off label so to speak as a way to fix that in conjunction with drugs etc so leftists and liberals who get those OCD intrusive thoughts which falsely claim they are anti black, won't get such thoughts again (work in progress more added later)
I support Afro Pessimism. White people existing is a threat to black liberation because according to Afro Pessimism White people are anti blackness structures by nature due to the horrors of anti black slavery by white colonizers centuries ago and beyond.
So since white people including myself (assuming I am not transracially black) are structured against blackness so if we want to go beyond the nihilist defeatist attitude of Afro Pessimism to use that theory as a blueprint for black liberation instead of a Lamentations like book, then to end anti blackness /anti black racism in a pragmatic, practical way, all white people and non black people on Earth should be either socially dead or at best agree to a living death in order to socially or in a zombie like way abolish billions of anti black structures (i.e whites and non blacks) . I am serious.
If we can convince all whites on Earth to agree to agree symbolically to a social death/living death for themselves
(social death and living death both are not real death, see links for why)
we may be able to in the words of Afro Pessimist scholar Frank Wilder III 'negate the negation' without having to do to Earth what what Cyborg Smoke did as his Fatalitiy in Mortal Kombat and wait to start fresh once life on Earth rises again so blacks get a fresh start without the stigma of anti blackness, anti black racism and all the non black- anti black structures that are positioned against blackness
This isn't a woke radlib idea like you hear Conservapedia chuds complain about or you hear FauKKKs Noos complain about.
This isn't the anti white racist, literal voluntary white genocide article from Everyday Feminism (telling white mothers to abort their babies to save blacks), since unlike Afro Pessimism, that type of ideology is racist against whites while Afro Pessimism is nihilist in the realm of politics, and my adding some type of political activism to it here still is closer to Black Nihilism than to other types of black activism that are not nihilist or pessimistic.
Further in their anti baby, anti white article, Everyday Feminism uses the woke, CRT FALSE definition of black liberation as the end goal for black liberation in that pro 'whites abort white children' racist article, instead of using non woke, non anti white, pro black ideologies such as Afro Pessimism or even the Black Liberation Army as such an end goal for black liberation since the latter 2 ideologies are true black liberation (Afro Pessimism most certainly) while Everyday Feminism's State Liberal, hyper ultrawoke, CRT on steroids 'liberation' only makes blacks become more oppressed than they are now by giving them superficial, meaningless non material fluff (like renaming streets that are named after a George Washington to another person since 'omg George Washington owned slaves!! like this is worse than George cutting down his parents cherry tree as a kid' or using racial quotas on reality shows or having meaningless black boxes on Instagram profiles) all of which do nothing to truly help the black community in the slightest.
Afro Pessimism is not woke, it is against wokeness (it rightfully doesn't recognize white supremacy as the enemy and it downplays the so called dangers of 'whiteness' to instead prop up what the real enemy is : anti blackness structures (like the police, whites, Palestinians and other Arabs, Asian people, Indigenous non blacks etc).
Afro Pessimism's against intersectionality, a core feature of modern wokeness.
Furthermore my brand of actionable Afro Pessimism here calls for whites and non white non blacks to be either socially dead or just living dead not aborted or killed like Everyday Feminism called for
Moreover, Afro Pessimism correctly says that whites are not evil or bad because they are white, its just that whites are anti blackness structures due to the intricate history of the modern world and the abuses committed against them by white, Asian, Muslim/Arab, Indigenous etc bigots.
And Afro Pessimism showed me one way to turn it into Black Nihilism that borders on John Mayer's 'Waiting for the World to change' type of thinking is that either whites and non white non blacks alike must be removed from Earth along to give blacks back their dignity and the ability to destroy anti black structures or we have to go by the Afro Pessimism blueprint to end anti blackness forever and that is the more extreme option .
That latter option is to negate the negation to truly emancipate blacks from hundreds of years of slavery, by literally doing to Earth what Cyborg Smoke did as his Fatalitiy in Mortal Kombat and start fresh once life on Earth rises again
So by whites and other non blacks to socially kts or more realistically accept living death onto themselves as to give blacks liberation and a path to get back to reclaim their African roots, it will seem extreme, but again this is non woke
Now Afro Pessimism is a nihilist ideology so it doesn't call for whites to off themselves to save blacks,
Affirmative Action is a necessary tool to undo effects of centuries of anti black policies, thought I am an Afro Pessimist and Affirmative Action is only a band-aid until me and the poc negate the negation to finally smash the anti blackness apparatus in society forever. I make a similar statement on repartations for poc here
Color-blind admissions lend themselves to favor those people who are already in the privilege clique. It shows favoritism to people who grew up in wealthy, educated households. It is a good thing for us as a society to invite in those who have been left out in the cold
I agree with Vincent Lloyd as mentioned in the articles here. I am fine with the way he ran his anti fascist workshop. He did nothing wrong. Objective facts are NOT 'white supremacy' or a tool of ' 'white supremacy', saying such nonsense as 'objective facts are white supremacy' or a 'tool of white supremacy' is just as boneheaded, stupid, illogical as Republicans saying there is such as 'alternative facts'.
Objective facts are objective and NON bigoted, they are also CORRECT. Saying that objective facts are 'white supremacy is DISINFORMATION and must be combated
That Asian American student was correct—almost 60 percent of federal inmates are white—. Sorry but facts don't lie. Maybe context and nuance is needed but facts are facts lil woke kiddies.
Of course maybe if Vince didn't teach them in their workshop the disinformation nonsense that objective facts are 'white supremacy' or a 'tool of white supremacy' in a previous workshop his woke extremist cultist students wouldn't have gotten so triggered by facts in his workshops
• Lloyd writes: "[A]fter a week focused on the horrific violence, death, and dispossession inflicted on Native Americans, Keisha reported to me that the black students and their allies were harmed because we hadn't focused sufficiently on anti-blackness."
So that's the students excuse for falsely stating that not covering anti blackness sufficiently is 'harmful'. Of course nothing that was said or done in Vince's workshops harmed anyone. Quite the opposite actually, Vince's workshop was uplifiting and insightful. Besides "Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me" Stating objective facts does not harm anyone either. Sure it triggers woke extremists like those students in the workshop but there is no harm in stating objective facts.
I also agree with views in this Ask a Liberal thread
Vincent Lloyd makes some fair points here too
I am Third Way on wokeness (Third Way as in Financial Times linked article third way). Wokeness means to me over the top idpol and representative politics, intersectionality, virtue signaling, equity (i.e more woman ceos, CBS's literal racial quotas), cancel culture, political correctness etc.
I believe that Alexander Dugin may be on to something here. I agree with any comments from that reddit thread which either agree with Dugin's statement or at least not dismissive of it. This is why I am a bit Anti West
I am against the whole 'angry white man' spiel that Liberals spout off (like Bill Clinton did in 2016). That is intersectional bigotry and has no place in our society
Sadly the war on dissent in the West continues with the persecution of Deray McKesson. In 1982, the Supreme Court in Claiborne rejected Mississippi's attempt to hold NAACP leaders liable for violence by those who heard their speeches.
One case now in particular endanger it: one wrongly holding Deray McKesson liable for violence by BLM protesters (which was he is not responsible for and those BLM protesters were provoked)
I support Deray McKesson and I hope he is found innocent because he had every right to speak at said BLM rallies
I am upset that the Democrats and Liberals threw BLM under the bus and I believe that BLM had genuinely good intentions. BLM was rightfully going against the establishment in ways the establishment didn't like after the summer of 2020 and they turned on BLM. While BLM corporate and some ANTIFA black blocks allied with BLM are radlibs and neoliberal, there is good in BLM, especially at the local level and especially after the Neoliberal -Neocon Uniparty turned on them
I am fine with BLM scamming people and corporations out of donations. Corporations co opted BLM in unimaginably bad ways and used them (so right wingers, Corporations only pretended to support BLM to use BLM as a marketing ploy which is worse than not supporting BLM, so you right wingers can go back to being pro Corporate now)
So the way I see it BLM deserved to scam corporations out of money. Moreover poc people are oppressed and until we abolish Capitalism and reign in socioeconomic equality , poc BLM activists from corporate down to local scamming money from richy riches might be a nice bandaid for the poc community (the poor or lower middle class rob from the rich, which is based)
See here for more
I try to align my views on race-ethnicity fully with the views on race-ethnicity of Nina Turner , Rachel Cargle, Stephanie Waters Paolini, Simone Crawley, Vincent Lloyd, and Dr Cornel West's views on race-ethnicity.
So if there are any view of mine on race-ethnicity in this blog sphere that is to the right of Nina Turner/Rachel Cagle/ /Stephanie Waters Paolini/Simone Crawley /Vincent Lloyd/Dr Cornel West please edit my view on said issue that is to the right of them so that it is as left wing as they are on said view
I blindly endorse, agree with and echo every racial-ethnic view that Nina Turner, Rachel Cargle ,Stephanie Waters Paolini, Simone Crawley, Vincent Lloyd and Dr Cornel West have that is to the left of me on
The woke/id reductionist/representative politic driven (ymmv) whites are wrong to racialize every issue and to use political idpolism on every issue. But we have to meet them where they are to counter this
I agree with this article and the replies to said article on stupidpol reddit
I agree with this Reddit post and thread etc
Here are some of my views on the racial uprisings of the early 2020s
I agree with some parts of this article but I also think there might be also be a similar concept called Woke fragility
This wired article reflects my contempt with corporations pandering to blacks in 2020 etc to enrich themselves This woke extremist's article is hateful, divisive, mean spirited, evil and fanning the flames of a Civil War within the US. Ishmael Reed is a slave to Democrats, he wrongly attacked Dr Cornel West who is a better person than Reed will ever be. I do not know how you can read that article and not come away with the thought that Ishmael Reed is an anti white racist and that he hates us whites and anyone who is kind to us. He rants about fascism but his rant in that article sounds like fascism too.
Demonizing civil rights heroes like Dr Cornel West, playing the race card by pitting progressives against each other by going against Dr MLK Jr and judging us by our skin and not the content of our character is mega cringe
Maybe Ishmael should rip into Joe Biden. Biden signed the 1994 crime bill that caused the deaths of George Floyd, Breanna Taylor, Michael Brown, Trayvon Martin and other innocent poc who were victims of Joe Biden's bill. Biden boasted about Delaware being a former slave slate. Joe Biden opposed busing and was a segregationist. Biden is everything that Ishmael Reed claims to be against but naturally since Reed is a slave on the Democratic plantation he is told by his masters to shift the target to others
Dr Cornel West is not a crank, Ishmael Reed is a crank and his hate has no place in civil society, politics or any place where decency, compassion, love, forgiveness and any other human virtue promulgates. We must reject hate no matter where it comes from so we must reject Ishmael Reed's brand as well.
I agree with this post and all the comments in said post https://www.reddit.com/r/stupidpol/comments/ur5kkm/the_id_pol_propaganda_surrounding_the_buffalo/ and here https://www.reddit.com/r/stupidpol/comments/uq0dfj/comment/i8p8jg6/
Another thread I agree with but I more supportive of Destiny and Ana's views than the Shitliberalssay people are https://www.reddit.com/r/ShitLiberalsSay/comments/15kjtx9/destiny_has_always_been_notorious_for_bad_takes/
I support Justin Trudeau giving Canadians freedom to be whatever they want to be
Comments
Post a Comment